How Good Was Andrew Tate at Kickboxing? Critics Say UFC Is a Different World
Andrew Tate, known today for his controversial online persona, first made a name for himself as a professional kickboxer. His accomplishments in the sport are not to be dismissed: he is a four-time world champion, having won titles in multiple weight divisions, including with organizations like the ISKA (International Sport Karate Association) and Enfusion.
With a reported record of 76 wins and 9 losses, Tate demonstrated solid striking, effective distance control, and knockout power—qualities that earned him genuine respect in kickboxing circles.
However, criticism often arises when fans and detractors debate how Tate’s skills would translate to mixed martial arts, particularly the UFC. Kickboxing and MMA, while both combat sports, are vastly different.
SHOP: The Kickboxer Collection
UFC fighters must be proficient not just in striking but also in wrestling, jiu-jitsu, and clinch work. Critics argue that Tate, who has no high-level experience in grappling or cage fighting, would struggle against even mid-tier UFC fighters.
Former fighters and analysts have pointed out that many elite strikers have entered the UFC with impressive records—only to falter due to inadequate ground skills. Without a wrestling or Brazilian jiu-jitsu base, even accomplished kickboxers can find themselves outmatched. “He wouldn’t last a round in the UFC,” some MMA purists claim, citing examples of dominant strikers like Gokhan Saki who struggled in the transition.
In summary, Andrew Tate was undeniably a high-level kickboxer with legitimate world titles. But UFC success demands a much broader skillset. While Tate’s striking could be dangerous in MMA, most experts agree that without serious grappling training, he would face steep challenges against the well-rounded athletes of the UFC.
READ MORE: Watch: Andrew Tate Steamrolls 60 men in wild sparring
Recent posts
