Logan Paul has found himself back in the spotlight, this time over his rare Pokémon card that is set to be auctioned in February. While online claims suggested the card had already been sold, that is not the case. The card has not yet changed hands and is instead scheduled to go under the hammer early next year, with Paul publicly promoting the upcoming auction.
The controversy stems from the card’s past involvement with Liquid Marketplace, where it was fractionalised, allowing users to buy shares rather than owning the asset outright. Critics online have accused Paul of inconsistency, arguing that fractional ownership confused buyers and that the move to auction the card now raises questions about transparency. Supporters counter that fractionalisation and a later auction are not unusual in alternative asset markets, provided the structure and terms are clearly communicated.
Much of the backlash has played out on social media, where commentators have alleged that Paul unfairly shifted blame onto Liquid Marketplace when the fractional ownership model failed to meet expectations. Paul has not admitted to wrongdoing and has maintained that the auction represents a legitimate next step in the card’s lifecycle rather than a resale of an already offloaded asset.

SHOP: Kickboxing Equipment
Why CryptoZoo Still Shapes the Reaction
The intensity of the criticism cannot be separated from Paul’s past association with CryptoZoo. The blockchain-based game project drew heavy criticism for failing to deliver on expectations, with many buyers claiming they lost money. Paul consistently denied that CryptoZoo was a scam and later announced a refund programme for affected users, framing it as an effort to make things right rather than an admission of guilt.
Legal disputes surrounding CryptoZoo ultimately went in Paul’s favour, with him winning the lawsuit related to scam accusations. Despite that outcome, the project remains a reference point whenever Paul promotes high-risk or unconventional investments. For many observers, trust was damaged, and every new venture is now scrutinised more aggressively.
Not only was Logan Paul's "PSA 10" Illustrator used to scam investors and users on Liquid Marketplace, it also shouldn't be a 10. It was graded a 9 several times previous to a slip up. It cost single digit dollars back then to regrade and PSA didn't care about Pokemon at that… pic.twitter.com/lhRCgOuMRp
— RattlePokemon (@RattlePokemon) December 25, 2025
That context explains why the Pokémon card auction has triggered such a strong reaction. Paul has encouraged people, particularly younger audiences, to consider nontraditional assets such as collectibles. While rare items like high-end Pokémon cards can hold legitimate value, critics argue that influencer promotion blurs the line between personal investment and financial encouragement.
At present, there is no evidence that the Pokémon card auction violates any laws or regulations. The card has not yet been sold, and the February auction will determine its final price in the open market. Still, the episode underlines a recurring issue for Paul: perception.
Even when operating within legal boundaries, past controversies mean that clarity and transparency are no longer optional. For Logan Paul, the upcoming auction is not just about a Pokémon card’s value, but about whether he can convince a sceptical audience that lessons from the past have truly been learned.







