Should Head Contact Be Allowed for Kids in Combat Sports?

Combat sports and martial arts have long been praised for the positive impact they have on children. Discipline, confidence, fitness, and self-defense are just a few of the benefits that draw parents to enroll their kids in activities such as boxing, kickboxing, Muay Thai, and mixed martial arts (MMA). However, while most people agree on the advantages of these sports, the question of whether children should be exposed to head contact remains a fiercely debated issue.

The Dangers of Head Contact for Children

Head contact in combat sports brings a significant risk of brain injury, even in adults. For children, whose brains and skulls are still developing, the risks are even higher. Repeated blows to the head can lead to concussions and, over time, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative brain condition linked to repeated head trauma. Studies have shown that young athletes are more vulnerable to long-term damage because their brains are not fully matured, making them less able to withstand the impact of head blows.

Jesse Saunders, a prominent referee for One Championship, is one of many voices expressing concern about head contact in children’s combat sports. In a Facebook post, Saunders wrote:

“I know it’s an old topic, and one I simply can’t be bothered to argue anymore, but what is with all these promotions happy to let kids do head contact? Hearing kids as young as 7 being offered head shots… I plead with all refs… refuse to ref these! You are the first person to be liable if something goes wrong!!”

SHOP: The Kickboxer Collection

Saunders’ concerns are echoed by medical professionals and child safety advocates who warn that allowing children to engage in head contact places them at an unnecessary and preventable risk. Many argue that until a child reaches a certain level of physical and neurological development, head contact should be strictly off-limits.

The Argument for Controlled Head Contact

On the other side of the debate, proponents argue that combat sports prepare children for real-life situations and that introducing controlled head contact under the supervision of trained professionals is part of developing a well-rounded fighter. They claim that banning head contact entirely could leave young athletes unprepared for the realities of higher-level competition as they age.

Supporters also argue that with proper protective gear, strict safety regulations, and well-trained referees, the risk of injury can be minimized. In their view, eliminating head contact altogether might deprive children of learning essential defensive skills, such as how to properly block and evade strikes.

Liability and Ethical Concerns

Referees, coaches, and event organizers face serious ethical and legal responsibilities when it comes to children’s safety. As Saunders pointed out, referees are the first line of defense, and they can be held liable if a child suffers a life-altering injury during a match. This raises important questions: Is the potential for injury worth the benefits of teaching head contact? Should referees and organizers be put in a position where they are responsible for safeguarding children from preventable harm?

A Call for Reform?

Given the potential dangers, many experts are calling for reforms in youth combat sports. Some suggest modifying rules to eliminate or significantly reduce head contact for children under a certain age. Others advocate for mandatory medical screenings, better concussion protocols, and enhanced training for referees and coaches to ensure that the safety of young athletes remains the highest priority.

Conclusion: Safety Should Come First

While there’s no denying the benefits of combat sports for children, safety must always come first. The debate over head contact is not just about technique or skill development — it’s about protecting young athletes from harm that could affect them for the rest of their lives. Until research and safety protocols advance to a point where the risk can be minimized, it may be wise to err on the side of caution and prohibit head contact for children in combat sports. The cost of being wrong is simply too high.